A taste alteration-related scale assesses megestrol to improve chemotherapy-induced anorexia.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy of megestrol in improving chemotherapy-related anorexia by analyzing the related scales of taste alteration. METHODS: We conducted the current study on a group of advanced patients with cancer with two or more chemotherapy cycles. The chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale (CiTAs) scale helped assess the megestrol effects on basic taste perception, aversive taste changes, unpleasant symptoms, and associated concerns. Furthermore, the Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire scale (SNAQ) helped measure the impact of megestrol on malnutrition likelihood in patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced anorexia. The World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL)-BREF Scale was used to evaluate the quality of life of participants, producing scores related to physical health, psychological well-being, environmental factors, and social relationships. RESULTS: The CiTAs scale assessment indicated that administering megestrol significantly enhanced taste perception among advanced patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Notably, the megestrol group patients showed significantly higher Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ) scores than the control group. The megestrol group patients also exhibited higher physiological (PHYS) scores than their control group counterparts. However, this distinction was not statistically significant. The study findings indicate that patients who received megestrol demonstrated significantly higher scores in psychological (PSYCH) and environmental(ENVIR) domains than the control group. Furthermore, megestrol administration was associated with significantly elevated SOCIL and ENVIR levels in patients. CONCLUSION: The proficient efficacy evaluation of megestrol in enhancing appetite, mitigating malnutrition likelihood, and improving the quality of life of chemotherapy-induced anorexic patients can be achieved through taste-related scales.

Propensity score-matching analysis comparing safety outcomes of appetite-stimulating medications in oncology patients.

PURPOSE: Anorexia and weight loss are common complications in the elderly, advanced cancer population. Appetite stimulants are commonly used therapies for oncology patients with weight loss, yet their safety comparison remains unknown. METHODS: This was a two-center, retrospective, study conducted in New York City at Mount Sinai Beth Israel and New York University Langone from January 2016 to July 2019 in adult patients with histologic evidence of malignancy who were taking either megestrol acetate or mirtazapine as an appetite-stimulating medication. Endpoints included safety concerns of mortality, QTc prolongation, venous thromboembolism, fall, somnolence, xerostomia, and hallucinations. Effectiveness of weight gain or maintenance of weight was not assessed. A propensity score-matching analysis was performed using a logistic regression analysis to assess the two comparable groups. RESULTS: The study included 350 patients (69.56 ± 13.31 years) with the most common malignancies being gastrointestinal, breast, and hematologic with metastasis present in over half the patients. Adverse events were commonly seen in the oncology population. After a propensity score-matched analysis, all safety outcomes associated with mirtazapine compared to megestrol acetate were similar; all-cause mortality (7%, n = 7 vs. 12%, n = 12, p = 0.23), QTc prolongation (31%, n = 31 vs. 31%, n = 31, p = 1.00), thromboembolism (11%, n = 11 vs. 11%, n = 11, p = 1.00), somnolence (29%, n = 30 vs. 22%, n = 23, p = 0.34), xerostomia (27%, n = 28 vs. 18%, n = 19, p = 0.24), and hallucinations (17%, n = 18 vs. 8%, n = 8, p = 0.06), respectfully. CONCLUSION: There were no safety differences seen when evaluating both agents.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Cyproheptadine in Poor Appetite: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study.

PURPOSE: Cyproheptadine, an antihistamine and antiserotonergic agent, is an appetite stimulant that is efficacious in promoting weight gain in children and adults with poor appetite. Despite numerous studies showing that cyproheptadine achieved positive outcomes, studies documenting its effectiveness on appetite are limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of cyproheptadine in adults with poor appetite in South Korea. METHODS: Patients aged 19 to 64 years with poor appetite were randomly assigned to receive either cyproheptadine or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the difference between the groups in change in appetite, as measured by the Korean version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System from the beginning to the end of the study period. The secondary end points included effects on weight, anthropometrics, body composition, Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire-measured appetite, and toxicities. A total of 375 patients were randomly assigned to the two groups (189 cyproheptadine, 186 placebo). FINDINGS: The cyproheptadine group experienced a mean (SD) change in appetite score of -2.42 (0.12) compared with -2.03 (0.13) in the placebo arm, representing a statistically significant appetite gain in the cyproheptadine group (difference, +0.38 [0.18]; 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.04; P = 0.0307). Patients in the cyproheptadine group experienced significant increases in weight and body mass index. The most common adverse event was somnolence, as predicted. Cyproheptadine was well tolerated, with one serious adverse event (colitis) which was classified as a moderate adverse effect unlikely to be related to the study drug. IMPLICATIONS: We present the largest randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of cyproheptadine versus placebo in healthy adults with poor appetite using the lowest effective dosage of cyproheptadine. Cyproheptadine is a safe treatment option in patients with poor appetite. Our findings provide important information for the use of cyproheptadine to ameliorate poor appetite in adults. Further randomized studies focused on the effect of cyproheptadine in older populations are needed.

Randomised placebo-controlled cross-over study examining the role of anamorelin in mesothelioma (The ANTHEM study): rationale and protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Cachexia is common in malignant mesothelioma (MM); half of patients have malnutrition and low skeletal muscle mass. Malnourished patients have worse quality of life (QoL). Weight loss is strongly associated with poor survival. Anamorelin is an oral ghrelin receptor agonist that improves appetite, body weight and QoL in advanced cancer. The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy of anamorelin in improving appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) and patient-reported outcomes in patients with MM with cachexia. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A single-centre, phase II, randomised, placebo-controlled cross-over pilot study with 28-day treatment periods and 3-day washout. Forty patients will be randomised. Primary outcome is change in ASM relative to height measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at end of period 1. Secondary outcomes include cancer-specific and cachexia-related QoL, objective physical activity, dietary intake and adverse events. Eligible patients will have confirmed MM, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-2, expected survival >3 months and cachexia (defined as >5% weight loss in 6 months or body mass index <20 kg/m2 with weight loss >2%). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted. Results will be reported in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (U1111-1240-6828).

Megestrol Acetate Induces Declarative Memory Changes and Cortisol Suppression in Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND: The effects of the glucocorticoid and progesterone receptor agonist megestrol on declarative memory, and the ability of phenytoin to block these effects, were assessed. METHODS: Healthy volunteers received each medication combination (placebo and megestrol, phenytoin and megestrol, and placebo and placebo) using a randomized, crossover design. The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test assessed declarative memory. RESULTS: Megestrol was associated with a significant reduction in declarative memory (p = 0.0008), which was attenuated by phenytoin, and was associated with significant cortisol suppression compared to placebo (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Changes in memory and cortisol suppression were found in healthy volunteers given megestrol.

Clinical Inquiry: Is megestrol acetate safe and effective for malnourished nursing home residents?

No. Megestrol acetate (MA) is neither safe nor effective for stimulating appetite in malnourished nursing home residents. It increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis (strength of recommendation [SOR]: C, 2 retrospective chart reviews), but isn't associated with other new or worsening events or disorders (SOR: B, single randomized controlled trial [RCT]). Over a 25-week period, MA wasn't associated with increased mortality (SOR: B, single RCT). After 44 months, however, MA-treated patients showed decreased median survival (SOR: B, single case-control study). Consistent, meaningful weight gain was not observed with MA treatment (SOR: B, single case-control study, single RCT, 2 retrospective chart reviews, single prospective case-series).

Cardiac pathologic findings in 3 unusual cases of sudden cardiac death related to anorexiant drugs.

Amphetamine congeners can be prescribed as anorexiant drugs despite their potential adverse effects, including cardiac toxicity. However, the morphologic features of cardiac damage related to protracted use of these compounds are unknown. We provide a detailed description of cardiac autopsy findings in 3 cases of sudden death associated with protracted use of high doses of phendimetrazine and/or phenylpropanolamine or bupropion prescribed as anorexiants, in association with other compounds. The main cardiac findings were similar in all 3 cases: (1) mild-moderate hypertrophy of the left ventricle and/or the septum; (2) myocardial nonischemic scarring (midmural and/or subepicardial) appearing as discrete foci or with a bandlike morphology; (3) mild-moderate intramural small vessel disease in the absence of significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis; and (4) acute/recent inflammatory lesions consistent with toxic myocarditis. In summary, the detailed pathology examination of the heart in these 3 cases revealed myocardial lesions identical to those reported in catecholamine myocardial damage in all their various stages of evolution. In the presence of a clinical history of long-term intake of anorexiants of this category, it is most important at autopsy to recognize and correctly interpret the acute and chronic myocardial lesions of the type herein described because they represent an anatomical substrate for arrhythmic death.

Cancer Cachexia: Cause, Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Patients with cancer frequently experience unintended weight loss due to gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction caused by the malignancy or treatment of the malignancy. However, others may present with weight loss related to other symptoms not clearly associated with identifiable GI dysfunction such as anorexia and early satiety. Cancer cachexia (CC) is a multifactorial syndrome that is generally characterized by ongoing loss of skeletal muscle mass with or without fat loss, often accompanied by anorexia, weakness, and fatigue. CC is associated with poor tolerance of antitumor treatments, reduced quality of life (QOL), and negative impact on survival. Symptoms associated with CC are thought to be caused in part by tumor-induced changes in host metabolism that result in systemic inflammation and abnormal neurohormonal responses. Unfortunately, there is no single standard treatment for CC. Nutrition consequences of oncologic treatments should be identified early with nutrition screening and assessment. Pharmacologic agents directed at improving appetite and countering metabolic abnormalities that cause inefficient nutrient utilization are currently the foundation for treating CC. Multiple agents have been investigated for their effects on weight, muscle wasting, and QOL. However, few are commercially available for use. Considerations for choosing the most appropriate treatment include effect on appetite, weight, QOL, risk of adverse effects, and cost and availability of the agent.

The effect of conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on the nutritional status of COPD patients.

BACKGROUND: COPD patients are susceptible to anorexia, reduction of caloric intake, weight loss, and malnutrition. One of the possible mechanisms is the increase of inflammatory markers such as interleukin 1ß (IL1ß), is highly correlated with anorexia. Considering the anti-inflammatory role of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), this study aimed to investigate the effect of CLA supplementation on the nutritional status of COPD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a double-blind clinical trial, 93 COPD patients who volunteered to participate in the study and who filled out a written consent form, were randomly assigned to control or supplementation groups. The patients in the supplementation group received 3.2 g of CLA on a daily basis for 6 weeks, while those in the control group received placebo on a daily basis for 6 weeks. For IL1ß assessment, the patients' anthropometric indices and appetite score were checked and their blood samples were collected both before and after the treatment. Moreover, in order to investigate the changes in the caloric intake trend during the study, their dietary intake levels were assessed using 24-hour dietary recall, 3 days a week at the onset, in the 4th week, and at the end of the study. Eventually, 90 patients completed the study. RESULTS: The results demonstrated a significant increase in appetite score (P=0.001), average caloric intake (P=0.01), and macronutrient intake (P<0.05), while a significant decrease was observed in the serum level of IL1ß among the patients of the supplementation group (P=0.008). Meanwhile, although the supplementation group's body mass index was also higher on completion, compared to their own initial state as well as to that in the control group, the differences were not significant (P=0.13). CONCLUSION: The findings of this research indicate that the consumption of CLA supplementation can be effective in regulating the appetite and improving the nutritional status of patients suffering from COPD through adjusting the serum level of IL1ß.

A Prospective, Randomized, Masked, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study of Capromorelin in Dogs with Reduced Appetite.

BACKGROUND: Reduced appetite is a common clinical sign in dogs. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of capromorelin oral solution, (ENTYCE® , Aratana Therapeutics, Leawood, KS) a new drug that is a ghrelin receptor agonist, for stimulation of appetite in dogs with reduced appetite. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Capromorelin will increase appetite, as measured by the owner's evaluation, over 4 days. An additional objective was to evaluate the safety of capromorelin at the labeled dose. ANIMALS: A total of 244 client-owned dogs reported by owners to be inappetent for at least 2 days were enrolled, with 177 cases in the effectiveness analysis. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, masked, placebo-controlled study, dogs were treated daily with capromorelin (3 mg/kg) oral solution (n = 121) or placebo oral solution (n = 56). Owners completed an evaluation of appetite at days 0 and 3 ± 1. Success was defined as improvement in appetite at day 3. Safety was evaluated by physical examination, clinical pathology, and monitoring adverse events and owner observations. RESULTS: Capromorelin treatment improved appetite compared to placebo (68.6% and 44.6% treatment successes with 95% CI 59.7, 76.3 and 32.2, 57.8, respectively, P = .008). Mean body weight in capromorelin-treated dogs increased compared to placebo-treated dogs (1.8% with 95% CI 1.3, 2.3, and 0.1% with 95% CI 0.9, 1.1, respectively, P < .001). Adverse reactions occurring in >5% of either group were diarrhea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Capromorelin oral solution is an effective treatment for stimulation of appetite in dogs and represents the first ghrelin receptor agonist shown to be effective for this indication.

Using megestrol acetate to ameliorate protein-energy wasting in chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Various populations are affected by chronic kidney disease (CKD), and a low dose appetite stimulant megestrol acetate (MA) is sometimes recommended in patients with CKD to ameliorate protein-energy wasting (PEW). Patients with CKD are at greater risk of developing PEW since the progression of their disease can cause decreased nutrient intake, catabolic effects, systemic inflammation and metabolic changes. Providers can detect PEW in CKD by identifying low serum levels ≤3.8 g/dl of albumin, <30 mg/dl of transthyretin, or <100 mg/dl of cholesterol. Other characteristics include BMI <22 kg/m(2) (for ≤65 years), unintentional weight loss of ≥5% in three months or ≥10% in six months, body fat percentage <10%, with muscle wasting of a reduction of ≥5% in three months or ≥10% in six months of muscle mass. METHOD: A review of research was completed and data collected from small population-based retrospective studies to determine the effect of MA. RESULTS: Clinical trials demonstrated the effectiveness of MA by showing increases in BMI up to 9%, albumin levels up to 1.1 g/dl, with reported protein and energy intake increases from 27% to 42%. There are potential adverse effects of using MA in CKD. CONCLUSION: After reviewing the available literature, the benefits of using MA should be evaluated against the potential side effects. For further examination of MA's potential benefits, long-term, prospective, large clinical trials should be carried out.

Tolerability and pharmacokinetics of two formulations of megestrol acetate under fed conditions in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: Megestrol acetate oral suspension is an appetite stimulant indicated for cachexia. It is available in a conventional formulation and as a nanocrystal dispersion. The aim of this study was to compare the tolerability and pharmacokinetics of these formulations under fed conditions in healthy Korean volunteers. METHODS: This was a randomized, single-dose, 3-treatment, 3-period, 6-sequence, crossover study in healthy Korean volunteers. In each period, participants received single oral doses of conventional formulation 800 mg/20 mL (reference), nanocrystal dispersion 650 mg/5.2 mL (test 1), and nanocrystal dispersion 675 mg/5.4 mL (test 2) after a high-calorie, high-fat meal. The periods were separated by a washout period of 14 days. Serial blood samples were collected up to 120 hours after dosing. The plasma concentrations of megestrol acetate were determined with a validated LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by noncompartmental analysis. Tolerability was assessed by physical examinations, vital signs, clinical laboratory test results, and electrocardiograms. FINDINGS: Thirty-eight healthy volunteers completed the study. The geometric mean ratios of the AUC(last) and C(max) for test 1/reference were 0.88 (90% CI, 0.84-0.92) and 1.07 (90% CI, 0.99-1.15), respectively. The geometric mean ratios of the AUC(last) and C(max) for test 2/reference were 0.88 (90% CI, 0.84-0.93) and1.03 (90% CI, 0.96-1.10), respectively. All formulations were well tolerated. IMPLICATIONS: The pharmacokinetic characteristics and tolerability of the 2 megestrol acetate formulations are similar in fed volunteers and suggest no relevant difference in tolerability. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01342055.

Anamorelin for patients with cancer cachexia: an integrated analysis of two phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials.

BACKGROUND: Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Anamorelin is an oral ghrelin-receptor agonist with appetite-enhancing and anabolic activity. We assessed the effects of anamorelin on body composition, strength, quality of life, biochemical markers, and safety in patients with cancer anorexia-cachexia. METHODS: Data were pooled, a priori, from two completed phase 2, multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials in patients with advanced or incurable cancer and weight loss of 5% or more. Patients were stratified by weight loss severity (5-15%, >15%) and randomly allocated (1:1) with a computer-generated randomisation schedule to anamorelin hydrochloride 50 mg or placebo once-daily for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was lean body mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry over the 12 week treatment period in eligible patients who had at least one dose of study drug and post-treatment efficacy assessment. We assessed safety in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT00219817 and NCT00267358. FINDINGS: Between June 29, 2005, and Oct 26, 2006, we enrolled 44 patients in the anamorelin group and 38 patients in the placebo group. 74 patients were eligible for the efficacy analyses. Over 12 weeks, lean body mass increased in 38 patients in the anamorelin group by a least-squares mean of 1.89 kg (95% CI 0.84 to 2.95) compared with a decrease of a least-squares mean of -0.20 kg (-1.23 to 0.83) for 36 patients in the placebo group (difference 2.09 kg [0.94-3.25]; p=0.0006). 42 (95%) of 44 patients treated with anamorelin and 33 (87%) of 38 patients treated with placebo had adverse events. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (treatment-related or not) in the anamorelin group were fatigue, asthenia, atrial fibrillation, and dyspnoea (two [5%] each); in the placebo group, such events were pneumonia (three [8%]) and anaemia, thrombocytopenia, abdominal pain, anxiety, and dyspnoea (two [5%] each). INTERPRETATION: Anamorelin treatment for 12 weeks had a favourable clinical response profile in patients with cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome. These findings support further investigation in this setting. FUNDING: Helsinn Therapeutics (US), Helsinn Healthcare SA.

Circulating glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) inhibits eating in male rats by acting in the hindbrain and without inducing avoidance.

To address the neural mediation of the eating-inhibitory effect of circulating glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), we investigated the effects of 1) intra-fourth ventricular infusion of the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin-9 or 2) area postrema lesion on the eating-inhibitory effect of intrameal hepatic portal vein (HPV) GLP-1 infusion in adult male rats. To evaluate the physiological relevance of the observed effect we examined 3) the influence of GLP-1 on flavor acceptance in a 2-bottle conditioned flavor avoidance test, and 4) measured active GLP-1 in the HPV and vena cava (VC) in relation to a meal and in the VC after HPV GLP-1 infusion. Intrameal HPV GLP-1 infusion (1 nmol/kg body weight-5 min) specifically reduced ongoing meal size by almost 40% (P < .05). Intra-fourth ventricular exendin-9 (10 µg/rat) itself did not affect eating, but attenuated (P < .05) the satiating effect of HPV GLP-1. Area postrema lesion also blocked (P < .05) the eating-inhibitory effect of HPV GLP-1. Pairing consumption of flavored saccharin solutions with HPV GLP-1 infusion did not alter flavor acceptance, indicating that HPV GLP-1 can inhibit eating without inducing malaise. A regular chow meal transiently increased (P < .05) HPV, but not VC, plasma active GLP-1 levels, whereas HPV GLP-1 infusion caused a transient supraphysiological increase (P < .01) in VC GLP-1 concentration 3 minutes after infusion onset. The results implicate hindbrain GLP-1 receptors and the area postrema in the eating-inhibitory effect of circulating GLP-1, but question the physiological relevance of the eating-inhibitory effect of iv infused GLP-1 under our conditions.

Phase I/II trial of formoterol fumarate combined with megestrol acetate in cachectic patients with advanced malignancy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to test the safety, tolerability and efficacy of a novel combination of an anabolic ß2-agonist and an appetite stimulant in patients with cancer cachexia. METHODS: Thirteen patients (M/F 5:8) with advanced malignancy and involuntary weight loss received oral formoterol (80 µg/day) and megestrol acetate (480 mg/day) for up to 8 weeks. Quadriceps size (MRI), quadriceps and hand-grip strength, lower limb extensor power, physical activity and quality of life were measured at baseline and at 8 weeks. Response criteria were specified pre-trial, with a major response defined as an increase in muscle size ≥ 4 % or function ≥ 10 %. RESULTS: Six patients withdrew before 8 weeks, reflecting the frail, comorbid population. In contrast, six out of seven (86 %) patients completing the course achieved a major response for muscle size and/or function. In the six responders, mean quadriceps volume increased significantly (left 0.99 vs. 1.05 L, p=0.012; right 1.02 vs. 1.06 L, p=0.004). There was a trend towards an increase in quadriceps and handgrip strength (p>0.05). The lack of appetite symptom score declined markedly (76.2 vs. 23.8; p=0.005), indicating improvement. Adverse reactions were few, the commonest being tremor (eight reports), peripheral oedema (three), tachycardia (two) and dyspepsia (two). CONCLUSIONS: In this frail cohort with advanced cancer cachexia, an 8-week course of megestrol and formoterol in combination was safe and well tolerated. Muscle mass and/or function were improved to a clinically significant extent in most patients completing the course. This combination regimen warrants further investigation in larger, randomized trials.

Growth hormone secretagogues exert differential effects on skeletal muscle calcium homeostasis in male rats depending on the peptidyl/nonpeptidyl structure.

The orexigenic and anabolic effects induced by ghrelin and the synthetic GH secretagogues (GHSs) are thought to positively contribute to therapeutic approaches and the adjunct treatment of a number of diseases associated with muscle wasting such as cachexia and sarcopenia. However, many questions about the potential utility and safety of GHSs in both therapy and skeletal muscle function remain unanswered. By using fura-2 cytofluorimetric technique, we determined the acute effects of ghrelin, as well as of peptidyl and nonpeptidyl synthetic GHSs on calcium homeostasis, a critical biomarker of muscle function, in isolated tendon-to-tendon male rat skeletal muscle fibers. The synthetic nonpeptidyl GHSs, but not peptidyl ghrelin and hexarelin, were able to significantly increase resting cytosolic calcium [Ca²âº]i. The nonpeptidyl GHS-induced [Ca²âº]i increase was independent of GHS-receptor 1a but was antagonized by both thapsigargin/caffeine and cyclosporine A, indicating the involvement of the sarcoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. Evaluation of the effects of a pseudopeptidyl GHS and a nonpeptidyl antagonist of the GHS-receptor 1a together with a drug-modeling study suggest the conclusion that the lipophilic nonpeptidyl structure of the tested compounds is the key chemical feature crucial for the GHS-induced calcium alterations in the skeletal muscle. Thus, synthetic GHSs can have different effects on skeletal muscle fibers depending on their molecular structures. The calcium homeostasis dysregulation specifically induced by the nonpeptidyl GHSs used in this study could potentially counteract the beneficial effects associated with these drugs in the treatment of muscle wasting of cachexia- or other age-related disorders.

Megestrol acetate for treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome.

BACKGROUND: This is an updated version of a previously published review in The Cochrane Library (2005, Issue 2) on 'Megestrol acetate for the treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome'. Megestrol acetate (MA) is currently used to improve appetite and to increase weight in cancer-associated anorexia. In 1993, MA was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of anorexia, cachexia or unexplained weight loss in patients with AIDS. The mechanism by which MA increases appetite is unknown and its effectiveness for anorexia and cachexia in neoplastic and AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) patients is under investigation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of MA in palliating anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with cancer, AIDS and other underlying pathologies. SEARCH METHODS: We sought studies through an extensive search of electronic databases, journals, reference lists, contact with investigators and other search strategies outlined in the methods. The most recent search for this update was carried out in May 2012. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies were included in the review if they assessed MA compared to placebo or other drug treatments in randomised controlled trials of patients with a clinical diagnosis of anorexia-cachexia syndrome related to cancer, AIDS or any other underlying pathology. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent review authors conducted data extraction and evaluated methodological quality. We performed quantitative analyses using appetite and quality of life as a dichotomous variable, and analysed weight gain as continuous and dichotomous variables. MAIN RESULTS: We included 35 trials in this update, the same number but not the same trials as in the previous version of the review. The trials comprised 3963 patients for effectiveness and 3180 for safety. Sixteen trials compared MA at different doses with placebo, seven trials compared different doses of MA with other drug treatments and 10 trials compared different doses of MA. Meta-analysis showed a benefit of MA compared with placebo, particularly with regard to appetite improvement and weight gain in cancer, AIDS and other underlying conditions, and lack of benefit in the same patients when MA was compared to other drugs. There was insufficient information to define the optimal dose of MA, but higher doses were more related to weight improvement than lower doses. Quality of life improvement in patients was seen only when comparing MA versus placebo but not other drugs in both subcategories: cancer and AIDS. Oedema, thromboembolic phenomena and deaths were more frequent in the patients treated with MA. More than 40 side effects were studied. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review shows that MA improves appetite and is associated with slight weight gain in cancer, AIDS and in patients with other underlying pathology. Despite the fact that these patients are receiving palliative care they should be informed of the risks involved in taking MA.

Clinical review: The human experience with ghrelin administration.

CONTEXT: Ghrelin is an endogenous stimulator of GH and is implicated in a number of physiological processes. Clinical trials have been performed in a variety of patient populations, but there is no comprehensive review of the beneficial and adverse consequences of ghrelin administration to humans. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed was utilized, and the reference list of each article was screened. We included 121 published articles in which ghrelin was administered to humans. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ghrelin has been administered as an infusion or a bolus in a variety of doses to 1850 study participants, including healthy participants and patients with obesity, prior gastrectomy, cancer, pituitary disease, diabetes mellitus, eating disorders, and other conditions. There is strong evidence that ghrelin stimulates appetite and increases circulating GH, ACTH, cortisol, prolactin, and glucose across varied patient populations. There is a paucity of evidence regarding the effects of ghrelin on LH, FSH, TSH, insulin, lipolysis, body composition, cardiac function, pulmonary function, the vasculature, and sleep. Adverse effects occurred in 20% of participants, with a predominance of flushing and gastric rumbles and a mild degree of severity. The few serious adverse events occurred in patients with advanced illness and were not clearly attributable to ghrelin. Route of administration may affect the pattern of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Existing literature supports the short-term safety of ghrelin administration and its efficacy as an appetite stimulant in diverse patient populations. There is some evidence to suggest that ghrelin has wider ranging therapeutic effects, although these areas require further investigation.